(Reminder:
official minutes of the Melrose School Committee can be found on the
melroseschools.com web site following approval by the Committee. My notes are
below, and edits and errors are mine alone.)
With the FY17 budget approved, the Committee moved on to additional
regular business and began discussions around goal setting and planning. Two
MHS student representatives joined us to provide updates on exams, athletic
milestones, and other happenings at the high school, as well as their
re-election as representatives to the Committee next year. Graduation will be
held on the evening of June 3rd.
Announcements of the
Superintendent
Supt. Taymore provided an in-depth look at expectations around summer work
for students. Based on Committee questions, she noted that the purpose of
summer work is to reinforce skills (not punish), addressed Title I summer
services, agreed to bring back to administrators the suggestion that
assignments are explicit in their expectations in order for students to take
them seriously, and offered that students who take more challenging classes
know that summer work will be assigned. * She then invited Bridge Director
Jennifer McAllister to present her annual review of Bridge activities and
events. Ms. McAllister noted the significant increase in Bridge registrations
this year and that she is now using Google docs to share registration and other
information with appropriate parties. She was asked whether Melrose Grad Night
could share CORI information with the Bridge and Supt. Taymore agreed to
explore that possibility. Ms. McAllister was commended for supporting equity
across the district relative to providing volunteers for libraries, enrichment
activities, etc. She closed by noting that next year’s Trivia Bee will be held
on March 26th, 2017.
Educational Programs
and Personnel
Regarding the FY16-17
Elementary School Handbook, Supt. Taymore welcomed Hoover Principal Jenny
Corduck, Roosevelt Principal Mary Ann Maranto, and Winthrop Principal John
Maynard, indicating that principals from our other two elementary schools had
personal situations that precluded their attendance and that they apologized
for their absence. Ms. Corduck indicated that their work was a significant
undertaking, beginning with reorganizing it to move items most likely to be
referenced by families to the front and also aligning the organization to the
Secondary Handbook so that families would be accustomed to the format as they
moved through the system. There were some language changes consistent with
attorney recommendations, the homework policy was removed (since it had not
been revised in some time and a homework committee was being organized to
review it), Google was explained more completely, more links were added, and an
Arabic translation statement was included, among other changes noted in the “Changes
and Edits” document preceding the revised handbook in the packet. Questions and
responses addressed sharing this information with PTO’s at the first fall
meeting, potentially maintaining the handbook in one web site location for all
elementary schools, the fact that high school students can’t provide
translation services, student access to buildings earlier than the normal time
during foul weather, and the fact that the ECC handbook is not identical to the
Elementary Handbook but is referenced when being updated each year.
Finance and Facilities
A number of weeks ago, and
in order to balance the budget, the Committee agreed to approve activity fees
at the secondary level. Supt. Taymore subsequently recommended stepping back
from that recommendation so that the new Director of Co-Curricular Activities
and parents could explore amounts and fee structures more thoroughly. The $15
activity fee for middle school students and a $35 activity fee for high school
students expected for FY17 were rescinded.
Policy and Planning
A proposed Field Trip
Policy was presented for informational review. Mr. O’Connell indicated that it speaks
to the types, duration, and location of field trips. It doesn’t include some language
in the current policy around parity or financial impact on students (which we
may want to add back in) but does speak to authority for approvals. The goal is
to update the policy in accordance with state laws and Supt. Taymore’s previously
adopted guidelines. The Supt. noted that current policy negatively affects the
approval of some field trips now, she wants to update the current practices,
and there are challenges around timing of approval that should balance staff/students’
needs and the Committee’s schedule. She was asked whether changes to the guidelines
would include permission slips and she responded in the affirmative. A change log/mark-up
document was requested in order to review changes. It was noted that policy
should guide the Supt.’s procedures, and the policy classification system is an
alpha system for reference.
Announcements of the Chair
A June 4th
iRaiders field trip called “Mayhem in Merrimack (NH)” requiring Committee
approval was unexpectedly identified yesterday. Supt. Taymore requested that
the Committee provide an initial approval for which paperwork and information
would be provided at the June 14th meeting for final (retroactive)
approval. Comments centered on the excellent integrity of the iRaiders
organization, liability issues (none were identified), and that field trip
permission slips would be required by Supt. Taymore prior to departure. * The
2017 School Committee calendar was presented and approved. * The Committee’s
Overarching Goals were introduced in the context of a goal and action item
development timeline. Discussion included an interest (in future years
potentially) to have conversations around goals in a less
business-oriented/more conversational meeting, encouragement to think about
SMART goals as broad and aligned with our role as a Committee, and the
potential for revisiting the overarching goals within this year’s process. The
Committee approved the overarching goals as re-affirmed on May 12, 2015. * The
rolling agenda was presented and is updated frequently based on the amount and
depth of work being done in the district. <The
updated version is now posted here: http://d1868cr0a5jrv6.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Rolling-Agenda-2016-Sheet1-1.pdf.>
* Finally, the Committee was reminded
that on May 10th we added a Public Inquiry Session on Configuration
of Instructional Programs for May 31st but this morning, the
Permanent School Building Committee explained that the complexities around the space needs/configuration
exploration and process made it premature for the Committee to meet with the
community on that date. They were unanimous and adamant that the meeting
be rescheduled to a later date. In order to inform the community as quickly as
possible of a reschedule, a vote was requested for this evening. Members
supported a meeting that we could all attend, but the importance of community
attendance was highlighted. A thorough packet document with virtually all
options listed was noted to be valuable and important and there was concern
that the community feels that the decision has already been made. Supt. Taymore
noted that the primary reason for postponing is precisely because no decision has
been made, and at the Permanent School Building Committee meeting, it became
clear that there are so many options that they want more detail around all of
them in order to provide a solid presentation. Members commented that nighttime
is often more difficult to attend than Saturday mornings, that the venue should
be the right size for the community, that the 18th is the weekend
prior to the last (half day) of school on June 20th and families
might already be shifting to summer mode, that if the meeting is held on the 11th
there are still two more Committee meetings in June for the community to
comment before any initial decisions, and that the Committee would not make any
decisive/permanent votes without a full vetting by the Committee and the
community (expected after the summer). The decision was made to reschedule the May
31st meeting to June 11th at 9 a.m. Further discussion
centered on the community understanding how the process will develop over the
next few months with the intention of keeping everyone informed as thoroughly
as possible. * One Liaison Report was presented: Ms. DeSelm, on behalf of the
Human Rights Commission, invited the Committee and community to attend a
workshop on cultural proficiency in the Aldermanic Chamber on June 7th
at 7 p.m. with Susan Naimark, which they hope to have televised.
Post-Executive Session
Announcements were made regarding approval of prior Executive
Session’s meeting minutes, and
agreements with the administrators’ union (Teamsters) and teachers’ union (MEA)
regarding the recently approved administrative reorganization.
Meeting packet documents
can be found here: http://melrosecityma.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=2621&Inline=True
and the meeting can be watched at http://www.mmtv3.org/index.php?categoryid=28.
The next meeting is the
presentation and public inquiry session on Configuration of Instructional
programs (related to challenges around the space challenges relative to
increasing enrollments). It will be held Saturday,
June 11th at 9:00 a.m. (location to be determined). The next
regular meeting will be held Tuesday,
June 14th at 7:00 p.m. in the Aldermanic Chamber of City Hall.